A new survey released today by Korn Ferry finds directors on Fortune 1000 boards in a quandary: How to add the skills their boards require to remain competitive while maintaining the membership they currently have.
One-third of survey respondents say their board as currently constituted is not adequate to meet the company’s competitive needs, and more than half are eager to add directors with these missing skills. Further, nearly two-thirds indicate that they have identified new skills?financial, global, regulatory, and cybersecurity top the list?that they consider competitively necessary to have on their boards.
But 69% indicate they are satisfied with their current board composition, and only one in four favors term limits or enforced retirement ages that might open up seats.
The survey was completed in June, and the 156 respondents comprised board chairs and nominating governance committee chairs.
“The current proxy season was distinguished by a record number of shareholder proposals seeking proxy access and a say in the director nominating process, and directors themselves recognize the need for new skills on the board,” said Tierney Remick, Vice Chairman, Board and CEO Services. “Given the long-term trend to maintain small, agile boards, current board leadership may need to consider how to make room for these new directors.”
Additional top-line findings from the survey include: