Improved CEO Assessments May Significantly Boost Corporate Value and CEO Tenure
From the Korn Ferry Institute: some news that should be of great interest to CEOs-to-be and the boards that hire them.
According to new studies recently released by the Korn Ferry Institute, the research arm of Korn Ferry, companies that rely on more sophisticated CEO assessments may see significant gains—as high as 80 percent in market cap alone.
These results are just the latest example of companies around the globe turning to more innovative, sophisticated methods for hiring their most valued—and typically highest paid—leaders. Much of the effort has been directed at curtailing CEO turnover, which hit a six-month high in December and has periodically surged since.
The most recent findings are based on the results of two separate studies by Korn Ferry. Each centers on the company’s recently enhanced CEO Readiness Assessment program, which evaluates an array of competencies, ranging from the CEO’s ability
to handle the ever-growing complexities that the job requires to inspiring staffers and building trust.
The key objective is to gain a well-rounded view of a candidate’s personality and abilities aligned with the real-life conditions that CEOs must operate under every day. This is crucial because—since candidates are often internal successors—boards are frequently assessing and predicting the performance of a candidate in a position he or she has likely never held.
In a pilot study last fall, the Korn Ferry Institute analyzed its hiring assessment data for 118 candidates who later went on to take the CEO seat. The second study was completed in the spring of 2016 and included the original 118 CEOs plus an additional 44 CEOs, totaling 162 executives who had become CEO.
The results demonstrated that CEOs who achieve high scores on the assessment outperform low-scoring CEOs on three key financial outcomes: revenue, market cap, and earnings per share. Even small differences among potential CEOs may matter, Korn Ferry executives said.
The reason? It appears that better assessments lead to longer- tenured CEOs. According to the research, high scorers on the overall assessment who went on to become a CEO served an average of 67 percent longer as CEO—6.1 years, compared with low scorers’ tenures of 3.6 years (against a benchmark of 4.6 years of Fortune 500 CEOs overall).
While companies and their unique cultures vary widely, and there is no single formula for predicting a CEO’s tenure or financial impact, the tools used to assess candidates have improved markedly in recent years. That means boards can dramatically improve their odds of selecting a CEO who will succeed at the helm long enough to drive sustainable financial performance.
This news about increasingly sophisticated assessment methods that lead to safer CEO picks should provide a good measure of reassurance to boards. Now more than ever, boards are being carefully scrutinized and assessed themselves, and with CEO succession and selection among the board’s primary duties, it won’t hurt to be able to demonstrate that directors followed a rigorous process and did their own due diligence before hiring a new CEO.