Sick Days Up, Impatience Too?
See the latest issue of Briefings at newsstands or read in our new format here.
By: Lisa Rabasca Roepe
Amid a pandemic that created one tragic health crisis after another, it’s somewhat remarkable that sick days at US firms didn’t skyrocket. In fact, according to one data-marketing firm, a third of workers took no sick days in 2020 and 2021. Before COVID, nearly six in ten people took up to five sick days a year.
Give companies credit for trying to change, with new wellness programs that encourage employees to watch their heath and take sick days when needed. But as the pandemic eases and workload increases, patience among coworkers may start to wear thin fast, experts say, creating new tension among teams. “The pandemic has brought out the best and worst in people,” says Shannon G. Taylor, Ph.D., a professor of management at the University of Central Florida in Orlando who has studied employee attitudes toward sick coworkers.
Before COVID, it was not unusual for sick employees to ask if they could work from home, says Ron Porter, a Korn Ferry senior client partner and member of the firm’s Global Human Resources Center of Expertise. Now, he says, employees are calling their bosses, saying they can’t work from home because they don’t feel well—a reflection not only of the better wellness plans but also of shifting employee attitudes since the pandemic. Today, of course, a growing number of workers are looking for better work-life balances and deciding that working through illness makes no sense. “Some employees may be looking at the bigger picture and realizing work isn’t the be-all and end-all,” Porter says.
But experts say it’s more than likely that managers and colleagues may become more quietly miffed at some people’s sick days. Today, after all, millions of people are quitting jobs, and firms are struggling to fill these and other staffing shortages. That means absences are likely to be felt a lot more. “We’re working with leaner resources today and the job market is tight,” Porter says. When one person is out of the office, everyone else has to pick up more work. “If someone is feeling like they have enough on their plate, they don’t want to be bothered by other people’s issues,” Taylor says.
The remote-work era has also changed this dynamic. Some workers might have less empathy for colleagues because they don’t see them in the office every day. Or, with new hires arriving but working remotely, their colleagues may never have met them in person. In short, the “office” has become a world with many strangers. “Without strong social bonds, we’re less tolerant of people and don’t trust them as much,” Porter says.
Answers to any of this won’t come easy. Porter says a good start would be for managers to remind a team dealing with an absence that they too will likely need to take a sick day at some point. Smart leaders will also try to spread the share of extra work more evenly, or extend project deadlines that aren’t critical and that stretch staffers thin. Either way, as with many issues like these, change starts at the top. “Managers should lead by example,” says Taylor. “If a company culture supports not working when you’re sick, then managers need to demonstrate that.”et zero, and none will be able to completely offset its own emissions. Executives everywhere will need to work with their big suppliers and seek out new technologies from innovative organizations.
Perhaps most importantly, directors should consider looking at whether executives are incentivized to get to net zero. To get big organizations to take definitive actions, directors should tie a larger portion of executive compensation to hitting net-zero-related targets. “This is not just going to happen willy-nilly,” Carey says.